The Hunger Games ignited a new type of Young Adult novel
adaptation. Something more dangerous
than Twilight, the stakes much higher and the trauma much more realistic. Dystopian future stuff. Cautionary tales about a world that has
destroyed itself because of pointless wars.
And it’s not just a Battle Royale rip-off, although there are a lot of
similarities. For a kids’ series, it’s
actually pretty daring. So of course it
stands to reason that there would be a few knock-offs as well. Enter Divergent.
Divergent isn’t strictly a rip-off, it just has a lot in
common with The Hunger Games. There’s a
strong yet deeply troubled heroine, a twisted regime to topple, sections of
people with different cultures (called Factions here rather than Districts),
and of course, a tepid love story. But
where The Hunger Games can back up most of its generic plot points with good
actors and an interesting aesthetic, Divergent remains middle-of-the-road in
all accounts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f41e/2f41e107983f829d3d7c244528cd5298b950e915" alt="".jpg)
While I feel like there are interesting points to be made
about the government, eugenics, “Factionless” (this world’s version of bums),
and more, this film doesn’t delve into anything in a very interesting way. Instead it clings to a fairly typical
blockbuster structure without caring enough to go any deeper.
It’s frustrating when you can see good ideas under the surface
of a very average film. But ironically
this film is just as one-dimensional as the characters from each Faction. Better not let them have more than one
personality trait! That’s too confusing.
No comments:
Post a Comment